The Manchester Arena bombing, the London Bridge attack, Shamima Begum. These are some examples of terrorism headlines in the past few years.
The Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019 is the Government’s latest answer to curbing and punishing terrorist activity. The Act creates new terrorism offences, changes some old ones, and increases the maximum sentence for many existing ones. The new provisions came in to force on 12 April 2019 and apply to offences committed on or after that date.
Expression of Support for Proscribed Organisations
This new offence covers a situation where a person expresses an opinion or belief that supports a proscribed organisation and is reckless as to whether the person listening will be encouraged to support it.
This is explained as plugging a gap expressed by the Court of Appeal in Anjem Choudary’s case; that it was not unlawful to support a proscribed organisation, or to express those views.
It was an offence to actually and intentionally invite support for them.
Doubtless there will be free speech challenges to this new provision under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court in Choudary ruled that the existing offence of inviting support did not breach Article 10 because it did not restrict the expression of views.
Publication of Images and Seizure of Articles
This creates an offence of publishing images, including videos, of prohibited clothing/articles (usually flags or banners) in circumstance where it arouses a reasonable suspicion that the person is a member of a prohibited group.
It covers situations where the image itself may be very good evidence of the person wearing or displaying an article, but no offence is committed because they are not in a public place in the photograph.
The photograph itself, of course, can reach a wide audience (for example via social media) similar to being in a public place, but this was not an offence up to now.
Obtaining or Viewing Material over the Internet
This makes it an offence to simply view, on top of actually download/record, information likely to be useful to a terrorist attack. It also clarifies that the existing provisions do indeed include downloading information.
There is a defence if a person can show a reasonable excuse, for example a journalist researching a story.
This offence may also face legal challenge based on free speech and freedom of expression.
Entering or Remaining in a Designated Area
This section is expressly to deal with “foreign fighters” that leave the UK for places such as Syria in order to fight for proscribed organisations such as IS.
The Secretary of State can make regulations designating areas outside the UK, where he is satisfied it is necessary in order to protect the public from threats of terrorism.
It would then become as offence for UK nationals or residents to go to, or remain in, any of those designated places subject to a one-month grace period and exceptions for people such as diplomats or armed forces, and other reasons such international aid work or to visit a terminally ill relative.
It is also a defence to enter involuntarily.
The Secretary of State must keep any designation under review, and in any event a designation lapses after three years.
Encouraging Terrorism and Dissemination of Terrorist Publications
This section amends the current sections 1 and 2 of the Terrorism Act 2006.
It changes the requirement that statements or publications made are likely to be understood by those at whom they are directed to a test that they are likely to be understood by the reasonable person.
This means that the offence will now cover situations where statements or publications are made towards children or those who do not have the capacity to understand the remarks made.
Sentences for Terrorism Offences
The maximum sentence for some terrorism offences are increased. They are:
- Failure to disclose information about terrorism: doubled to ten years.
- Collection of information likely to be useful to a terrorist: increased from ten to 15 years.
- Eliciting, collecting or publishing information about the armed forces likely to be useful to a terrorist: increased from ten to 15 years.
- Encouragement of terrorism: more than doubled from seven to 15 years.
- Dissemination of terrorist publications: more than doubled from seven to 15 years.
Existing sentencing guidance will need to be reviewed in light of these changes.
How we can assist
If you need specialist advice, then get in touch with any member of our vastly experienced Criminal Defence team, for assistance with any criminal law related matter.
Mr John Stokes (John.Stokes@danielwoodman.co.uk),
Mr Anthony Pearce (Anthony.Pearce@danielwoodman.co.uk),
Ms Sarah Turland (Sarah.Turland@danielwoodman.co.uk),
Mr Daniel Woodman (Daniel.Woodman@danielwoodman.co.uk) or
Mr Lorne Wilkinson (Lorne.Wilkinson@danielwoodman.co.uk).